What to Know About Jay Bhattacharya, Trump’s Pick to Lead NIH

UglyR Jay Bhattacharya likes to lead President Trump’s National Institute of Health for Health (NIH), which has traditionally been the largest fund of biomedical research in the world.

On March 5, Senate, a professor at Stanford University’s Health Policy, will face issues of health, education, labor and pension committee as they will try to confirm the leadership of one of the most powerful health agencies in the country.

Here is what to know about Bhattacharya.

He is the son of immigrants

Bhattacharya was born in Kolkata, India and said in Podcast visit That his mother came from slums, while his father, an electrical engineer, was part of the country’s middle class. In the 1970s, his family was in the US. Migration, settled first in Massachusetts, and then in California outside Los Angeles. When he was 18, Bhattacharya became a Presbyterian from Hinduism.

He is interested in health economics

Bhattacharya got four degrees in Stanford: a graduate degree, Master, MD and Ph.D. He worked as an economist at Rand Corporation before returning to Stanford to join the faculty.

Bhattacharya has researched health economics and studied the sensitive population of the US, analyzing the country’s health care system and the government’s policies affecting the health of these groups.

It has controversial opinions on Kovid -19

During the epidemic, Bhattacharya became a familiar and contradictory specialist of the disease, taking numerous interviews and publishing the public health officials’ virus. Based on the data they were watching, they believe that Kovid -19 was lighter than health experts -which included government people -it happened, and claimed that Kovid -19 tests were not only serious cases and people who developed symptoms, but not symptoms. “Many people are moving around with evidence of Kovid infection that we will not count because they do not show Doctor Cutter; He has a relatively mild infection, ”he said in 2020 Top.

In March 2020, he is a controversial co-author OPS In WallLK Lock Lock Question. He wrote, “It is not worth the cost of universal quarantine economy, community and personal mental and physical health.” “We should take immediate steps to evaluate the empirical support of the current lockdown.”

Read moreTough RFK junior accepts the ory vaccine amid a deteriorating outbreak

He co-authorized the announcement of Great Bearing in October Chatber 2020, an open letter, arguing to close the lockdown. In this letter, people were advised to let people go about their daily lives in the low risk of Kovid -19 infection, if they are infected, they would experience a mild disease and contribute to the gang immunity which would eventually protect the population.

NITIAL critics pointed out that the strategy would still endanger the most susceptible people to develop disease problems, such as people with elderly and weak immune systems.

He also Contradiction Mask command in schools. In 2021, he argued that “the benefits of a mask in preventing serious illness from Kovid -19 in children are infinite small,” and that “Kovid -19 is at risk for children than accidents or normal flu.” His views are contradictory to many public health officials, and he said at that time that he Found threats of death To give them a voice.

Their challenge on nih

If confirmed, Bhattacharya will lead the agency at a crossroad. Under the Trump administration, the NIH has changed its policy of research to organizations, resorting to the amount that will pay for only 15% of the total grant (against 30-70% or more) for overhead costs. The new policy has been temporarily stopped by the Federal Judge, but Bhattacharya will be responsible for making any changes to the policies and upgrades of the agency’s grant to make the NIH more efficient (which many Vaiga SCIENTISTS AGREE AS ​​AS AGAIN).