WEAshington-House Republicans unveiled a cost bill on Saturday, which will fund federal agencies by September 30, starting a big confrontation with Democrats over the outline of the government’s expenses.
The 99-pa bill will promote defense programs a bit while the 2024 budget will streamline Nondefense programs below the year levels. That approach is likely to be a nonstarter for most Democrats who have long insisted that defense and nondefense costs are in the same direction.
Congress should work by Friday to avoid partial government closure.
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., Despite the lack of buying from Democrats on Tuesday, is adopting a bill for votes on Tuesday, daring to vote against them and risk the shutdown. It is also stinging that the Republicans can often muscle the law by the house.
Generally, when it comes to keeping the government fully open for business, the Republican had to work with Democrats to create bilateral criteria, which both parties could support. That’s because the Republicans always lack votes to pass the cost bills on their own.
Critically, the strategy has the support of President Donald Trump, who has shown his ability to keep the Republican in line.
Trump praised the bill, wrote on X that the Republicans “be united – no disagreement – the next day has to fight when the time is right.”
He said, “Great things are coming to America, and I am asking you all a few months by September so we can continue to organize the ‘financial house’ of the country. ‘
House Republican -led employees outlined the move, saying that it would allow $ 2 892.5 billion in defense costs and $ 8 708 billion in Nondefense costs. Defense costs are slightly higher than the previous year’s level, but assistants said the cost of Nondeffens was below $ 13 billion last year.
The move will also not include funds requested by individual legislators for thousands of community projects across the country, often referred to as earmarks.
The bill does not cover most of the government’s costs, including programs like social security and Medicare. It is funded for two programs on the Auto to Pilot and is not regularly reviewed by Congress.
Home and Senate Allocation Committee, Connecticut Rip. Rosa Delareao and Vashington Shington Sen. The top Democrats of P Ty Tatti Murray, both issued statements exploding the law.
“I strongly oppose this full year’s constant resolution,” Delaaro said.
Murray said the law “will give Donald Trump and Elon Musk more power at federal costs – and more power to choose winners and lost people, which threaten the families of blue and red states uniformly.”
The head of the Senate Allocation Committee, Maine San Susan Collins, said that it is necessary to focus on preventing the shutdown because there are negative consequences of closure throughout the government.
“They need border patrol agents, our military and members of the Coast Guard, some essential government employees like border patrol agents, our military and Coast Guard, TSA screens and air traffic controllers, to report when they will receive the next package,” Coline said. “We don’t let it happen.”
Trump’s request for unity seems to have an impact. Some Rs SERV Chitos who ever voted for consistent resolutions, expressed very openness for one last week.
Rip. Ralph Norman, Rs. He says that Trump and the government’s efficiency are confident in the leadership of Alon Musk to make a difference on the debt of the nation.
“I don’t like CRS,” Nomen said. “But what is the option? Negotiations with Democrats? Number. “
“Do I stabilize costs for six months to identify more cuts? Someone tells me how it is not a victory in Washington, “rap. Chip Roy, R-Texas, other MLAs, who repeatedly voted against the bill cost, but have supported a six-month consecutive resolution.
Republicans also hope that by compromising this year’s expenses, they will allow their full attention to increase the country’s debt limit to increase the individual tax reductions passing during Trump’s first term and to avoid catastrophic federal defaults.
Democratic leaders are warning that the decision to move forward without consulting their will increase the chances of shutdown. Their biggest concern is that the law will cost the Trump administration at a cost.
Democratic leadership in both chambers has emphasized that the Republican has a majority and is responsible for funding the government. But leaders have also been careful about how Democrats will vote on a constant resolution.
“We have to wait to see what his plan is,” said Chik Schumer, a Senate Democratic leader of New York. “We always believe that the only remedy is a bilateral remedy, no matter what it is.”
New York House Democratic leader Hakim Jeffreese said earlier this week that Democratic Cocks will meet and discuss the law “at the right moment”. But he struck a more powerful tone on Friday.
Jeffrees said that the Democrats “meaningful, bilateral cost agreement” is willing to negotiate the working people who keep the working people first. But he said that the “constant resolution” threatens to cut funds for major programs, such as the benefits of retired soldiers and nutrients for low -income families.
“It’s not acceptable,” Jeffrees said.
Trump is meeting with the House Republican in an attempt to win his votes on the law. The Republican has a majority of 218-214 in the house, so if all the MLAs vote, they can only afford one defection if the Democrats are united in opposition. Mathematics in the Senate becomes harder, where at least seven Democrats have to vote for the law to remove Philibster. And all those 53 Republicans vote for it.
This story originally appeared on Time.com read the full story
